Cross-reactive antibody responses to coronaviruses elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination (preprint)

Background: The newly emerged SARS-CoV-2 possesses shared antigenic epitopes with other human coronaviruses. We investigated if COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection may boost cross-reactive antibodies to other human coronaviruses. Methods Pre- and post-vaccination sera from SARS-CoV-2 naïve healthy subjects who received three doses of the mRNA vaccine (BioNTech, BNT) or the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac, CV) were used to monitor the level of cross-reactive antibodies raised against other human coronaviruses by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In comparison, convalescent sera from COVID-19 patients with or without prior vaccination history were also tested. Pseudoparticle neutralization assay was performed to detect neutralization antibody against MERS-CoV. Results Among SARS-CoV-2 infection naïve subjects, BNT or CV significantly increased the anti-S2 antibodies against Betacoronaviruses (OC43 and MERS-CoV) but not Alphacoronaviruses (229E). The pre-vaccination antibody response to the common cold human coronaviruses did not negatively impact the post-vaccination antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. Cross-reactive antibodies that binds to the S2 protein of MERS-CoV were similarly detected from the convalescent sera of COVID-19 patients with or without vaccination history. However, these anti-S2 antibodies do not possess neutralizing activity in MERS-CoV pseudoparticle neutralisation tests. Conclusions Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination may potentially modulate population immune landscape against previously exposed or novel human coronaviruses. The findings have implications for future sero-epidemiological studies on MERS-CoV.

Priming conditions shape breadth of neutralizing antibody responses to sarbecoviruses (preprint)

Vaccines that are broadly cross-protective against current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) or across the sarbecoviruses subgenus remain a priority for public health. Virus neutralization is the best available correlate of protection. We used sera from cohorts of individuals vaccinated with two or three doses of RNA (BNT162b2) or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 (Coronavac or Sinopharm) vaccines with or without a history of previous SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV-1 (in 2003) infection, to define the magnitude and breath of cross-neutralization in a multiplex surrogate neutralization assay based on virus spike receptor binding domain of multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC), SARS-CoV-2 related bat and pangolin viruses, SARS-CoV-1 and related bat sarbecoviruses. SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV-1 infection followed by BNT162b2 vaccine, Omicron BA.2 breakthrough infection following BNT162b2 vaccine or a third dose of BNT162b2 following two doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac elicited the highest and broadest neutralization across VOCs. Considering breadth and magnitude of neutralization across all sarbecoviruses, those infected with SARS-CoV-1 immunized with BNT162b2 outperformed all other combinations of infection and/or vaccination. These data may inform vaccine design strategies for generating broadly neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variants or across the sarbecovirus subgenus.

Virus neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant BA.2 in those vaccinated with three doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac vaccines. (preprint)

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2 is increasing in some areas of the world and it is important to assess how well current vaccines may protect against this infection. BioNTech Pfizer (BNT162b2) and CoronaVac are widely used COVID-19 vaccines globally. We determined the 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50) and PRNT90 antibody titres to BA.2 virus in sera (twenty each collected 3-5 weeks after third dose) from cohorts vaccinated with three doses of BNT162b2, three doses of CoronaVac, two doses of CoronaVac followed by a third dose of BNT162b2 and those convalescent from SARS-CoV-2 (ancestral virus) (143-196 days after infection). We compared the PRNT titres to BA.2 with titres to BA.1 and ancestral virus. We demonstrate that PRNT50 and PRNT90 antibody titres to BA.2 are markedly reduced compared with those to ancestral virus and reduced as much as was observed for BA.1 virus. Those vaccinated with three doses of BNT162b2 or vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac and a third dose of BNT162b2 develop PRNT antibody titres above the protective threshold from symptomatic infection. Those vaccinated with three doses of CoronaVac fail to achieve protective levels of PRNT50 antibody to BA.2 subvariant of Omicron 3-5 weeks after vaccination.

Neutralizing antibody titres to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and wild-type virus in those with past infection or vaccinated or boosted with mRNA BNT162b2 or inactivated CoronaVac vaccines (preprint)

Omicron, a novel SARS-CoV-2 variant has emerged and is rapidly becoming the dominant SARS-CoV-2 virus circulating globally. It is important to define reductions in virus neutralizing activity in serum of convalescent or vaccinated individuals to understand potential loss of protection from infection or re-infection. Two doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac vaccines provided little 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT 50 ) antibody immunity against the Omicron variant, even at one-month post vaccination. Booster doses with BNT162b2 in those with two doses of either BNT162b2 or CoronaVac provided acceptable neutralizing immunity against Omicron variant at 1-month post-booster dose. However, three doses of BNT162b2 elicited higher levels of PRNT 50 antibody to Omicron variant suggesting longer duration of protection. Convalescent from SARS-CoV-2 infection did not have protective PRNT 50 antibody levels to Omicron, but a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine provided protective immunity. Field vaccine-efficacy studies against Omicron variant against different vaccines are urgently needed.

Long-Term Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Responses After Infection and Estimates of the Duration of Protection (preprint)

The duration of immunity in SARS-CoV-2 infected people remains unclear. Neutralizing antibody responses are the best available correlate of protection against re-infection. Recent studies have estimated that the correlate of 50% protection from re-infection was 20% of the mean convalescent neutralizing antibody titre. We used sera collected from a cohort of 125 individuals with RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections up to 386 days after symptom onset. In the subset of 65 sera collected from day 151 to 386 after symptom onset, all remained positive in 50% plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT50). Because antibody waning follows a bimodal pattern with slower waning beyond day 90 after illness, we fitted lines of decay to 115 sera from 62 patients collected beyond 90 after symptom onset and estimate that PRNT50 antibody will remain detectable for around 1,717 days after symptom onset and that 50% protective antibody titers will be maintained for around 990 days post-symptom onset, in symptomatic patients. Peak PRNT titres in mildly symptomatic children did not differ from those in mildly symptomatic adults but these antibody titres appear to wane faster in children. There was a high level of correlation between PRNT50 antibody titers and the % of inhibition in surrogate virus neutralization tests. We conclude that there will be relatively long-lived protection from re-infection following symptomatic COVID-19 disease.Funding Information: The study was supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund, Commissioned research on Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) (Reference no COVID190126) from the Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government and the Theme-based Research Scheme project no. T11-712/19-N, the University Grants Committee of the Hong Kong Government.Declaration of Interests: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.Ethics Approval Statement: Written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their parents (when the participant was a child) and the studies were approved by the institutional review boards of the respective hospitals, viz. Kowloon West Cluster (KW/EX-20-039 (144-27)), Kowloon Central / Kowloon East cluster (KC/KE-20-0154/ER2) and HKU/HA Hong Kong West Cluster (UW 20-273).

Ocular manifestation, comorbidities, and detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 from conjunctiva in coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic has presented major challenges to ophthalmologists. Reports have shown that ocular manifestations can be the first presenting symptoms of COVID 19 infection and conjunctiva may be a portal of entry for the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) associated coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV 2). The purpose of this article is to provide general guidance for ophthalmologists to understand the prevalence of ocular presentation in COVID 19 patients and to reduce the risk of transmission during practice. Relevant studies published in the period of November 1, 2019, and July 15, 2020, regarding ocular manifestations of COVID 19 and detection of SARS CoV 2 in the eye were included in this systematic review and meta analysis. The pooled prevalence of the ocular manifestations has been estimated at 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.10) among COVID 19 patients. The pooled detection rate of SARS CoV 2 from conjunctiva was low (1%, 95% CI: 0.00-0.03). Conjunctival symptoms were the most common ocular manifestations in COVID 19, but the positive detection rate of the SARS CoV 2 virus by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of conjunctival tears or secretions remained low. No study has shown a definite transmission of COVID 19 through ocular mucosa or secretions. In summary, ocular manifestations in COVID 19 patients commonly comprise ocular surface symptoms. Although a low prevalence of ocular symptoms was encountered among patients infected by SARS CoV 2, it is imperative for all ophthalmologists to understand the full spectrum of COVID 19 symptoms or signs including those of the eyes as well as to adopt appropriate protective measures during clinical practice.